Xiaomi 11T Pro vs Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus

VS Xiaomi 11T Pro Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 11T Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888) that was released on September 15 2021 against the Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 920 and came out 5 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 11T Pro

• Water-resistant body (IP53 classification)
• 55% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (782K versus 503K)
• Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
• Delivers 37% higher peak brightness (843 against 617 nits)
• Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
• Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 2750 MHz
• Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
• 38% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1144 and 827 points
• Has a built-in infrared port

Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus

• Shows 12% longer battery life (33:03 vs 29:32 hours)
• Optical image stabilization
• Reverse charging feature
• Weighs 22 grams less
• Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness 11T Pro 87 Realme 9 Pro Plus 81 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games 11T Pro 85 Realme 9 Pro Plus 57 Battery Battery life charging type and speed 11T Pro 77 Realme 9 Pro Plus 79 Camera Photo and video recording quality 11T Pro 72 Realme 9 Pro Plus 71 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission 11T Pro 87 Realme 9 Pro Plus 87 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation 11T Pro 80 Realme 9 Pro Plus 72

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Xiaomi 11T Pro Price Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: 11T Pro vs Realme 9 Pro Plus

Display

Type	AMOLED	Super AMOLED
Size	6.67 inches	6.4 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels	1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	395 ppi	411 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Max rated brightness	500 nits	450 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR	1000 nits	600 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes HDR10
Screen protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	84.2%
Display features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming

Display tests

RGB color space	97.5%	95.9%
PWM	490 Hz	218 Hz
Response time	3.4 ms	9 ms
Contrast	∞ Infinity	∞ Infinity

Peak brightness test (auto) 11T Pro +37% 843 nits Realme 9 Pro Plus 617 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height	164.1 mm (6.46 inches)	160.2 mm (6.31 inches)
Width	76.9 mm (3.03 inches)	73.3 mm (2.89 inches)
Thickness	8.8 mm (0.35 inches)	7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight	204 gramm (7.2 oz)	182 gramm (6.42 oz)
Waterproof	IP53	No
Rear material	Glass	Glass
Frame material	Metal	Plastic
Colors	White Gray Blue	Black Blue Green
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in home button	Yes in-display

Screen-to-body ratio 11T Pro +1% 85.1% Realme 9 Pro Plus 84.2%

Performance

Tests of Xiaomi 11T Pro and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 888	MediaTek Dimensity 920
Max. clock	2840 MHz	2500 MHz
CPU cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)	- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache	4 MB	2 MB
Lithography process	5 nanometers	6 nanometers
Graphics	Adreno 660	Mali-G68 MC4
GPU clock	840 MHz	950 MHz
FLOPS	~1720 GFLOPS	~684 GFLOPS

Memory

RAM size	8 12 GB	6 8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory clock	2750 MHz	2133 MHz
Channels	4	2

Storage

Storage size	128 256 GB	128 256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card	No	No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) 11T Pro +38% 1144 Realme 9 Pro Plus 827 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) 11T Pro +64% 3846 Realme 9 Pro Plus 2339 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 11T Pro +55% 782133 Realme 9 Pro Plus 503573

CPU	205241	139222
GPU	306865	139936
Memory	123253	95131
UX	146272	127876
Total score	782133	503573

3DMark Wild Life Performance 11T Pro n/a Realme 9 Pro Plus 2298

Stability	-	99%
Graphics test	-	13 FPS
Graphics score	-	2298
PCMark 3.0 score	-	11810

AnTuTu 9 Android Phone Scores Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)	Android 12
ROM	MIUI 13	Realme UI 3.0
OS size	32 GB	15 GB

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	5000 mAh	4500 mAh
Charge power	120 W	60 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse charging	No	Yes
Fast charging	Yes (63% in 10 min)	Yes (77% in 30 min)
Full charging time	0:20 hr	0:49 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	10:27 hr	12:29 hr
Watching video	13:59 hr	14:47 hr
Gaming	05:40 hr	05:58 hr
Standby	87 hr	96 hr

General battery life 11T Pro 29:32 hr Realme 9 Pro Plus +12% 33:03 hr Phones With Long Battery Life

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	108 megapixels	50 megapixels
Image resolution	12032 x 9204	8700 x 5800
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	Dual LED	LED
Stabilization	Digital	Optical
8K video recording	Up to 30FPS	No
4K video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
Slow motion	960 FPS (1080p)	960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens	120°	119°
Lenses	3 (108 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP)	3 (50 MP + 8 MP + 4 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.7 micron - Sensor: 1/1.52" Samsung S5KHM2 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus	- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 24 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0" Sony IMX355 (Exmor-RS CMOS)	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 16 mm - Pixel size: 1.14 micron - Sensor: 1/4" Sony IMX355 (Exmor-RS CMOS)
Macro lens	- 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 50 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5.0" Samsung S5K5E9 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus	- 4 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 21.8 mm - Pixel size: 1.75 micron - Sensor: 1/5" GalaxyCore GC02M1 (CMOS)
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples	Photo samples of Xiaomi 11T Pro from DxOMark	-

Selfie camera

Megapixels	16 megapixels	16 megapixels
Image resolution	4920 x 3264	4920 x 3264
Aperture	f/2.5	f/2.4
Focal length	26 mm	27 mm
Pixel size	1 microns	1 microns
Sensor type	-	Exmor-RS CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.06"	1/3.13"
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality 11T Pro 125 Realme 9 Pro Plus n/a Video quality 11T Pro 110 Realme 9 Pro Plus n/a Generic camera score 11T Pro 117 Realme 9 Pro Plus n/a

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.2	5.2
Bluetooth features	LE HID A2DP	LE A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC*	Yes	Depends on the region
Infrared port	Yes	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	No	No
Hybrid slot	No	No
LTE Cat*	20	-
5G support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
Headphone audio jack	No	Yes
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Speakers test Max. loudness 11T Pro 88.4 dB Realme 9 Pro Plus +4% 91.6 dB

Other

Category	Flagship	Mid-range
Announced	September 2021	February 2022
Release date	September 2021	February 2022
Sensors	- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Xiaomi 11T Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Xiaomi 11T Pro 23 (63.9%) Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 13 (36.1%) Vote Total votes: 36

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi 12 Pro and Xiaomi 11T Pro 2. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G and Xiaomi 11T Pro 3. Huawei Honor 70 and Xiaomi 11T Pro 4. Xiaomi 12 Lite and Xiaomi 11T Pro 5. Xiaomi 12T Pro and Xiaomi 11T Pro 6. Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 7. Oppo Realme GT Master Edition and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Plus and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 9. Oppo Realme 9 and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus 10. Oppo Realme GT Neo 3T and Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Xiaomi introduced affordable flagships Mi 11X and Mi 11X Pro - powerful


The rise of the 400 smartphone you want how much for a flagship Ars


Xiaomi Verkocht 18 7 Miljoen Telefoons In 2013 - Androidics nl


Xiaomi Launches Online Portal - Investing co uk


Xiaomi


Xiaomi Archives - Techkalauz


Xiaomi was officially removed from US Blacklist TechAlert24


XIAOMI - Quickmobile


Xiaomi Mi 11 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


XIAOMI


Opaska Mi Band 5 - Xiaomi AZE Tech


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560


Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008


Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062


Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014


Apple iPhone X Wallpapers HD

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Huawei Nova Y70

VS Samsung Galaxy A13 Huawei Nova Y70

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.6-inch Samsung Galaxy A13 (with Exynos 850) that was released on March 4 2022 against the Huawei Nova Y70 which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 710A and came out 2 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A13

• 54% higher pixel density (400 vs 260 PPI)
• Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
• More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 850
• More recent OS version: Android 12 versus 11
• Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Reasons to consider the Huawei Nova Y70

• 60% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (204K versus 127K)
• Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
• Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
• 94% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 298 and 154 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy A13 68 Nova Y70 59 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy A13 14 Nova Y70 26 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy A13 81 Nova Y70 85 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy A13 62 Nova Y70 61 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy A13 71 Nova Y70 67 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy A13 57 Nova Y70 58

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy A13 Price Huawei Nova Y70 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy A13 vs Nova Y70

Display

Type	PLS TFT	IPS LCD
Size	6.6 inches	6.75 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2408 pixels	720 x 1600 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	400 ppi	260 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Max rated brightness	500 nits	450 nits
HDR support	No	No
Screen protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	84.1%
Display features	-	- DCI-P3

Display tests

RGB color space	99.9%	-
PWM	Not detected	-
Response time	33 ms	-
Contrast	1257:1	-

Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy A13 589 nits Nova Y70 n/a Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height	165.1 mm (6.5 inches)	168.3 mm (6.63 inches)
Width	76.4 mm (3.01 inches)	77.7 mm (3.06 inches)
Thickness	8.8 mm (0.35 inches)	8.98 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight	195 gramm (6.88 oz)	199 gramm (7.02 oz)
Waterproof	No	No
Rear material	Plastic	Plastic
Frame material	Plastic	Plastic
Colors	White Black Blue Yellow	White Black Blue
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in home button	Yes in home button

Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy A13 83.2% Nova Y70 +1% 84.1%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy A13 and Huawei Nova Y70 in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Samsung Exynos 850	HiSilicon Kirin 710A
Max. clock	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
CPU cores	8 (8)	8 (4 + 4)
Architecture	- 8 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55	- 4 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A73
L3 cache	-	1 MB
Lithography process	8 nanometers	12 nanometers
Graphics	Mali-G52 MP1	Mali-G51 MP4
GPU clock	820 MHz	650 MHz
FLOPS	~126 GFLOPS	~225 GFLOPS

Memory

RAM size	3 4 6 GB	4 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	32 64 128 GB	64 128 GB
Storage type	eMMC 5.1	-
Memory card	MicroSD	MicroSD
Memory card max. size	Up to 1024 GB	Up to 512 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy A13 154 Nova Y70 +94% 298 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy A13 590 Nova Y70 +137% 1401 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy A13 127592 Nova Y70 +60% 204586

CPU	43950	62828
GPU	22702	32042
Memory	38791	55674
UX	22119	52410
Total score	127592	204586

3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy A13 508 Nova Y70 n/a

Stability	98%	-
Graphics test	3 FPS	-
Graphics score	508	-
PCMark 3.0 score	4899	-

Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 12	Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11)
ROM	One UI Core 4.1	EMUI 12
OS size	16.5 GB	-

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	5000 mAh	6000 mAh
Charge power	15 W	22.5 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse charging	No	No
Fast charging	Yes (27% in 30 min)	Yes (50% in 50 min)
Full charging time	2:18 hr	2:30 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	11:49 hr	-
Watching video	13:14 hr	-
Gaming	06:54 hr	-
Standby	122 hr	-

General battery life Galaxy A13 34:21 hr Nova Y70 n/a Smartphone Battery Life Ranking

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	50 megapixels	48 megapixels
Image resolution	8700 x 5800	8000 x 6000
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
8K video recording	No	No
4K video recording	No	No
1080p video recording	Up to 30FPS	Up to 60FPS
Angle of widest lens	-	120°
Lenses	4 (50 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP)	3 (48 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Phase autofocus	- 48 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Phase autofocus
Ultra-wide lens	- 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5" (CMOS)	- 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2
Macro lens	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4	-
Depth lens	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode

Selfie camera

Megapixels	8 megapixels	8 megapixels
Image resolution	3264 x 2448	3264 x 2448
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5	5.1
Bluetooth features	PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC*	Depends on the region	Depends on the region
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	No	No
Hybrid slot	-	Yes
LTE Cat*	7	12
5G support	No	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Mono	Mono
Headphone audio jack	Yes	Yes
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	No

Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy A13 83.3 dB Nova Y70 n/a

Other

Category	Budget	Mid-range
Announced	March 2022	April 2022
Release date	March 2022	May 2022
SAR (head)	0.37 W/kg	-
SAR (body)	1.39 W/kg	-
Sensors	- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint	- Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance is more important to you then choose the Huawei Nova Y70. But if the display connectivity and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A13.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy A13 1 (16.7%) Huawei Nova Y70 5 (83.3%) Vote Total votes: 6

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy A03s vs Galaxy A13 2. Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Galaxy A13 3. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Galaxy A13 4. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G vs Galaxy A13 5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 vs Huawei Nova Y70 6. Samsung Galaxy A23 vs Huawei Nova Y70 7. Huawei P30 Lite vs Nova Y70 8. Huawei Nova 8i vs Nova Y70 9. Huawei Honor X7 vs Nova Y70

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Galaxy S10

VS Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S10

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (with Exynos 2200) that was released on February 9 2022 against the Samsung Galaxy S10 which is powered by Exynos 9 Octa 9820 and came out 37 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

• The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
• Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
• 86% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (947K versus 509K)
• Comes with 1600 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 3400 mAh
• Shows 61% longer battery life (33:09 vs 20:33 hours)
• Has a 0.7 inch larger screen size
• Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
• Delivers 54% higher peak brightness (1277 against 828 nits)
• Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
• The phone is 3-years and 1-month newer
• More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 2200
• Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5

Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S10

• Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GB
• 10% higher pixel density (551 vs 500 PPI)
• Better grip in hands – the body is 7.5 mm narrower
• Weighs 71 grams less
• Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy S22 Ultra 94 Galaxy S10 76 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy S22 Ultra 88 Galaxy S10 57 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy S22 Ultra 85 Galaxy S10 62 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy S22 Ultra 89 Galaxy S10 76 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy S22 Ultra 92 Galaxy S10 89 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy S22 Ultra 88 Galaxy S10 70

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Price Samsung Galaxy S10 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Galaxy S10

Display

Type	Dynamic AMOLED	Super AMOLED
Size	6.8 inches	6.1 inches
Resolution	1440 x 3088 pixels	1440 x 3040 pixels
Aspect ratio	19.5:9	19:9
PPI	500 ppi	551 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	60 Hz
Max rated brightness	830 nits	1215 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR	1750 nits	-
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes HDR10+
Screen protection	Gorilla Glass Victus Plus	Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Screen-to-body ratio	90.2%	88.08%
Display features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display

Display tests

RGB color space	98.2%	98.1%
PWM	120 Hz	240 Hz
Response time	1 ms	4.8 ms
Contrast	∞ Infinity	∞ Infinity

Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy S22 Ultra +54% 1277 nits Galaxy S10 828 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height	163.3 mm (6.43 inches)	149.9 mm (5.9 inches)
Width	77.9 mm (3.07 inches)	70.4 mm (2.77 inches)
Thickness	8.9 mm (0.35 inches)	7.8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight	228 gramm (8.04 oz)	157 gramm (5.54 oz)
Waterproof	IP68	IP68
Rear material	Glass	Glass
Frame material	Metal	Metal
Colors	White Black Gray Blue Green Red	White Black Blue Green
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in-display	Yes in-display

Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy S22 Ultra +2% 90.2% Galaxy S10 88.08%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S10 in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Samsung Exynos 2200	Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9820
Max. clock	2800 MHz	2730 MHz
CPU cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (2 + 2 + 4)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2	- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A75 - 2 cores at 2.7 GHz: Mongoose
L3 cache	-	2 MB
Lithography process	4 nanometers	8 nanometers
Graphics	Samsung Xclipse 920	Mali G76 MP12
GPU clock	1300 MHz	720 MHz
FLOPS	-	~652 GFLOPS

Memory

RAM size	8 12 GB	8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory clock	-	2133 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	128 256 512 1024 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.1
Memory card	No	MicroSD
Memory card max. size	-	Up to 512 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy S22 Ultra +69% 1188 Galaxy S10 704 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy S22 Ultra +77% 3662 Galaxy S10 2066 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy S22 Ultra +86% 947861 Galaxy S10 509906

CPU	223163	123447
GPU	391575	191749
Memory	175188	85737
UX	154579	108901
Total score	947861	509906

3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy S22 Ultra +114% 6873 Galaxy S10 3209

Stability	64%	82%
Graphics test	41 FPS	19 FPS
Graphics score	6873	3209
PCMark 3.0 score	12633	8719

AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Results Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)	Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM	One UI 5.0	One UI 4.0
OS size	26.8 GB	9.5 GB

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	5000 mAh	3400 mAh
Charge power	45 W	15 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	Yes (15 W)	Yes Qi/PMA (9 W)
Reverse charging	Yes (wireless)	Yes (wireless)
Fast charging	Yes (60% in 30 min)	Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time	0:59 hr	1:35 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	11:20 hr	06:03 hr
Watching video	14:43 hr	10:32 hr
Gaming	05:53 hr	03:11 hr
Standby	109 hr	70 hr

General battery life Galaxy S22 Ultra +61% 33:09 hr Galaxy S10 20:33 hr Smartphone Battery Life Ranking

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	108 megapixels	12 megapixels
Image resolution	12000 x 9000	4000 x 3000
Zoom	Optical 10x	Optical 2x
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K video recording	Up to 24FPS	No
4K video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 240FPS
Slow motion	960 FPS (720p)	960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens	120°	123°
Lenses	4 (108 MP + 10 MP + 10 MP + 12 MP)	3 (12 MP + 12 MP + 16 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 24 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.33" Samsung S5KHM3 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.5 - 2.4 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Samsung SAK2L4 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens	- 10 MP - Aperture: f/4.9 - Focal length: 230 mm - Sensor: 1/3.52" Sony IMX574 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.5 - Focal length: 52 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.6" Samsung S5K3M3 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX563 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)	- 16 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 12 mm
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples	Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra from DxOMark	-

Selfie camera

Megapixels	40 megapixels	10 megapixels
Image resolution	7864 x 5200	4320 x 2432
Aperture	f/2.2	f/1.9
Focal length	26 mm	26 mm
Pixel size	0.7 microns	1.22 microns
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor size	1/2.82"	1/2.65"
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy S22 Ultra +8% 134 Galaxy S10 124 Video quality Galaxy S22 Ultra +14% 114 Galaxy S10 100 Generic camera score Galaxy S22 Ultra +13% 131 Galaxy S10 116

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot
Bluetooth version	5.2	5
Bluetooth features	LE	PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP LE HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	3.1
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	Yes	No
Hybrid slot	No	Yes
LTE Cat*	20	20
5G support	Yes	No

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
Headphone audio jack	No	Yes
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy S22 Ultra +3% 90.2 dB Galaxy S10 88 dB

Other

Category	Flagship	Flagship
Announced	February 2022	February 2019
Release date	March 2022	March 2019
SAR (head)	1.05 W/kg	0.48 W/kg
SAR (body)	1.58 W/kg	1.59 W/kg
Sensors	- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 37 (52.1%) Samsung Galaxy S10 34 (47.9%) Vote Total votes: 71

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 2. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus 4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Samsung Galaxy S22 6. Samsung Galaxy S10 or Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 7. Samsung Galaxy S10 or Google Pixel 6 8. Samsung Galaxy S10 or Samsung Galaxy S22 9. Samsung Galaxy S10 or Google Pixel 6a

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Samsung Smartphone Samsung Phone - Samsung One Review Samsung Mobile


Samsung wallpapers - Crazy Frankenstein


Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Wallpapers HD


PAPERS co iPhone wallpaper mw65-lake-calm-tree-mountain-sunny-day


samsung i7500 samsung galaxy galaxy i7500 samsung i7500 galaxy samsung


Samsung


Gambar Samsung galaxy 2012 terlengkap - Kumpulan Gambar Terlengkap


Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 08


Samsung I9000 Galaxy S specs review release date - PhonesData


Stylish HD Phone Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Samsung expects to sell 60 million smartphones in 2011 - Esato


Samsung Galaxy S I9000 -


Sunrise Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 030


Autumn Season Leaves Car Wallpaper - 1080x2280


Samsung Galaxy S i9000 Pictures The Tech Next


iPhone 7 krijgt gewoon weer een Samsung processor - Apparata


vs99-coffee-bokeh-pattern-wallpaper


sf92-blue-gray-gradation-blur - Papers co

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

VS Samsung Galaxy S22 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.1-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 (with Exynos 2200) that was released on February 9 2022 against the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max which is powered by Apple A15 Bionic and came out 5 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22

• Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
• Fingerprint scanner
• Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
• Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
• 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (925K versus 798K)
• Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
• Has 2 SIM card slots
• Better grip in hands – the body is 7.5 mm narrower

Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

• Has a 0.6 inch larger screen size
• Comes with 652 mAh larger battery capacity: 4352 vs 3700 mAh
• Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
• Apple releases software updates and supports their phones a few years longer than Samsung
• Delivers 22% higher peak brightness (1051 against 859 nits)
• 48% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1757 and 1187 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy S22 90 iPhone 13 Pro Max 91 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy S22 87 iPhone 13 Pro Max 87 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy S22 81 iPhone 13 Pro Max 93 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy S22 81 iPhone 13 Pro Max 87 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy S22 93 iPhone 13 Pro Max 77 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy S22 85 iPhone 13 Pro Max 87

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy S22 Price Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy S22 vs iPhone 13 Pro Max

Display

Type	Dynamic AMOLED	OLED
Size	6.1 inches	6.7 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2340 pixels	1284 x 2778 pixels
Aspect ratio	19.5:9	19.5:9
PPI	425 ppi	458 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Max rated brightness	780 nits	1000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR	1300 nits	1200 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes Dolby Vision
Screen protection	Gorilla Glass Victus Plus	Ceramic Shield
Screen-to-body ratio	87.4%	87.4%
Display features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3

Display tests

RGB color space	99.3%	99.9%
PWM	239 Hz	238 Hz
Response time	10 ms	8.5 ms
Contrast	∞ Infinity	∞ Infinity

Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy S22 859 nits iPhone 13 Pro Max +22% 1051 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height	146 mm (5.75 inches)	160.8 mm (6.33 inches)
Width	70.6 mm (2.78 inches)	78.1 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness	7.6 mm (0.3 inches)	7.65 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight	167 gramm (5.89 oz)	240 gramm (8.47 oz)
Waterproof	IP68	IP68
Rear material	Glass	Glass
Frame material	Metal	Metal
Colors	White Black Gray Blue Green Pink Purple Yellow	Black Silver Gold Blue Green
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in-display	No

Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy S22 87.4% iPhone 13 Pro Max 87.4%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy S22 and Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Samsung Exynos 2200	Apple A15 Bionic
Max. clock	2800 MHz	3200 MHz
CPU cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	6 (2 + 4)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2	- 4 cores at 2.02 GHz: Blizzard - 2 cores at 3.24 GHz: Avalanche
Lithography process	4 nanometers	5 nanometers
Graphics	Samsung Xclipse 920	Apple GPU
GPU clock	1300 MHz	1200 MHz

Memory

RAM size	8 GB	6 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory clock	-	2133 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	128 256 GB	128 256 512 1024 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	NVMe
Memory card	No	No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy S22 1187 iPhone 13 Pro Max +48% 1757 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy S22 3614 iPhone 13 Pro Max +31% 4752 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy S22 +16% 925853 iPhone 13 Pro Max 798603

CPU	227100	213823
GPU	383658	317561
Memory	149592	126792
UX	160666	136444
Total score	925853	798603

3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy S22 6530 iPhone 13 Pro Max +45% 9483

Stability	59%	82%
Graphics test	39 FPS	56 FPS
Graphics score	6530	9483
PCMark 3.0 score	12411	-

AnTuTu Results Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)	iOS 15 (Can be upgraded to iOS 16)
ROM	One UI 5.0	-
OS size	30.2 GB	13 GB

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	3700 mAh	4352 mAh
Charge power	25 W	27 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	Yes (15 W)	Yes (7.5 W)
Reverse charging	Yes (wireless)	No
Fast charging	Yes (63% in 30 min)	Yes (42% in 30 min)
Full charging time	1:03 hr	1:46 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	-	14:55 hr
Watching video	-	20:14 hr
Gaming	-	07:42 hr
Standby	-	140 hr

General battery life Galaxy S22 n/a iPhone 13 Pro Max 43:44 hr Phone Battery Life Ranking

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	50 megapixels	12 megapixels
Image resolution	8700 x 5800	4032 x 3024
Zoom	Optical 3x	Optical 3x
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K video recording	Up to 24FPS	No
4K video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
Slow motion	960 FPS (720p)	240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens	120°	120°
Lenses	3 (50 MP + 10 MP + 12 MP)	4 (12 MP + 12 MP + 12 MP + 0 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 24 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56" Samsung GN5 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.5 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.9 micron - Sensor: 1/1.66" Sony IMX703 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens	- 10 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 70 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.94" Sony IMX772 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.8 - Focal length: 77 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX713 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Phase autofocus
Depth lens	-	- Pixel size: 1 micron
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples	Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 from DxOMark	Photo samples of Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels	10 megapixels	12 megapixels
Image resolution	3872 x 2592	4032 x 3024
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	26 mm	23 mm
Pixel size	1.22 microns	1 microns
Sensor type	CMOS	Exmor-RS CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.24"	1/3.6"
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy S22 119 iPhone 13 Pro Max +21% 144 Video quality Galaxy S22 116 iPhone 13 Pro Max +3% 119 Generic camera score Galaxy S22 120 iPhone 13 Pro Max +14% 137

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.2	5
Bluetooth features	LE	LE A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	-
USB version	3.2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	1
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	-
eSIM support*	Yes	Yes
Hybrid slot	No	No
LTE Cat*	20	18
5G support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
Headphone audio jack	No	No
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy S22 +12% 89.5 dB iPhone 13 Pro Max 80.2 dB

Other

Category	Flagship	Flagship
Announced	February 2022	September 2021
Release date	March 2022	September 2021
SAR (head)	-	0.99 W/kg
SAR (body)	-	0.98 W/kg
Sensors	- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the software battery life and camera are more important to you then choose the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S22.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy S22 273 (64.1%) Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 153 (35.9%) Vote Total votes: 426

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Galaxy S22 2. Apple iPhone 13 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22 3. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Galaxy S22 4. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Galaxy S22 5. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G vs Galaxy S22 6. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max vs iPhone 13 Pro Max 7. Apple iPhone 13 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max 8. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max vs iPhone 13 Pro Max 9. Apple iPhone XR vs iPhone 13 Pro Max 10. Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+